Friday, December 26, 2008
Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers: The Story of Success
Now Malcolm Gladwell, author of "Blink" and "The Tipping Point" and a regular contributor to The New Yorker has just released "Outliers: The Story of Success." What, Gladwell asks, makes high-achievers different? He suggests that luminaries such as Mozart, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Apple Inc CEO Steve Jobs and the Beatles owe their successes to their culture, family and their generation. Gladwell also discusses why Asians are good at math.
Gladwell posited the theory of the ten-year rule: that the people who have succeeded have spent a minimum of ten years learning/practicing their metier. It could explain performances of Michael Johnson and Usain Bolt. His explanation about the Asians' superiority in math made sense. It is a cultural phenomenon, he suggested. He related this to the long hours spent by many Asians in rice fields: the patience and industry carried over to the training of the young. This is not such a novel idea since Asian schools offering extra lessons in math can be easily found in any major North American city. On the flip-side, there is a paucity of such schools in black communities, for example. Another idea is that 1955 was a good year to be born: Gates, Jobs and others were born that year. Gladwell was on Charlie Rose last week and spent time expounding on these ideas.
As a Jamaican, I became smitten by Gladwell after it turned out his mother is Jamaican and that he is a cousin of former US Secretary of State Colin Powell, whose parents were also Jamaicans.
In a happy coincidence - well, perhaps not - in the second part of the hour-long show, Rose's second guest was Geoff Colvin, Senior Editor at Large at Fortune magazine and author of "Talent is Overrated: What Separates World-Class Performers From Everybody Else". In this new book, Colvin expands on an article he wrote for Fortune, "What it Takes to be Great." Using Tiger Woods, Warren Buffett, Winston Churchill and Jack Welsh as examples, Colvin suggests that greatness does not come from DNA but from practice and perseverance sharpened over decades.
Both the Gladwell and Colvin books make perfect bookends.
Self Publishing on a Shoestring! (June 27, 2008)
An Outsider's View: Barack and Oprah (June 29, 2008)
I have long been an admirer of both Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama. I have bought and read her O magazines and I have his The Audacity of Hope. But I primarily admire their personal narratives. I am also a fan of the Clintons, Hillary and Bill, and she was my preferred candidate for the Democratic Presidential nomination. Those declarations out of the way then, let me get to the point: Ms Winfrey, a long time close friend of Mr. Obama's, screwed up big time when she publicly endorsed Mr Obama on CNN's Larry King Live. The name Oprah is a brand in the same way Apple, Sony, Coca Cola and BMW are brands. You wouldn't see the CEOs of any of those brands coming out in support of any political candidate and it is surprising that none of Ms Winfrey's advisers cautioned her about the public Obama endorsement.
When Mr. King asked why she was doing it now, she replied:
“Because I know him personally,” Ms. Winfrey said. “I think that what he stands for, what he has proven that he can stand for, what he has shown was worth me going out on a limb for – and I haven’t done it in the past because I haven’t felt that anybody, I didn’t know anybody well enough to be able to say, I believe in this person.”
Of course Ms. Winfrey could have found other ways to show her support: financial contributions, using surrogates like Gayle KIng, or invitations to Obama supporters to be on her show, using interview questions to help flesh out his campaign ideas. The point is there is a blurring of distinction between the personal (Oprah Winfrey) and the brand (Oprah). Then throw in race (both Ms. Winfrey and Mr. Obama being black); and gender: by endorsing Mr. Obama Ms. Winfrey was in a sense rejecting the historical candidacy of a woman. True, by winning his party's nomination, Mr. Obama was making his own history by becoming the first black nominee for President. But 75 per cent of Ms. Winfrey's viewers are women and 60 percent of American women who voted in the Democratic primaries, ended up supporting Hillary Clinton's candidacy.
It was not surprising then, that there has been a decline in her audience. As reported in the May 26, 2008 New York Times, Neilsen Media Research said the average audience for "The Oprah Winfrey Show" had fallen nearly 7 per cent in 2008, the third year in a row of decline. It is likely that following the presidential tussle between Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton, that this will end up being a tumultuous year for "The Oprah Winfrey Show" and Ms. Winfrey. It may turn out that her endorsement was the turning point in Mr. Obama's successful campaign but it may mark the moment her show "jumped the shark". In this context her recent deal with Discovery Communications to launch OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network with a 50-50 cable and web business was brilliant. Did she see the writing on the wall?
Remembrance of Things Past: Europe 2007 (June 29, 2008)
Just watched Spain beat Germany in the Euro 2008 soccer on TV. The match was played in Vienna, Austria. I had tentatively planned to be there in the audience. Normally, I am in Britain when major soccer tournaments are taking place: I was in Britain in 1998, 2002 and 2006 when the World Cup was being played (not in Britain mind you). But Vienna was one of my favorite cities during my eleven country European tour in summer 2007. In addition to the United Kingdom and Austria, I visited the Netherlands, France, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Slovenia, Poland, Hungary and Denmark. Sometimes it takes a trip like that to clear your mind and re-orient yourself, to figure out whether you want to continue living –and why- and perhaps how to plot your path forward.
I discovered my second wind in visits to the Tate of London where I saw Jackson Pollack’s work for the first time; I developed a new thirst for knowledge on my visits to Musée d'Orsay in Paris where I saw the works of the Impressionists. That visit fitted in well with the Teaching Company course I had completed: From Monet to Van Gogh: A History of Impressionism. I completed the circle by visiting The Vincent Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam.
I also liked Budapest: it was among the cheapest of all the European cities and it was beautiful at nights. But it was hot: close to 40 degrees Celsius.